Analisis Yuridis Tentang Threshold Pilkada Berdasarkan Putusan MK Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the juridical aspects of the threshold provisions in the Pilkada by referring to the decision. The research method used is a normative research method with a case approach that focuses on analyzing the Constitutional Court Decision Number 60/PUUXXII/2024. The results of the analysis show that the Constitutional Court's decision provides a new interpretation of the threshold provisions, which has the potential to affect the constitutional rights of political parties and independent candidates in the Pilkada contestation. The implication of this decision is a significant change in the regional head nomination mechanism in Indonesia. The General Elections Commission (KPU) revised KPU Regulation Number 8 of 2024 to KPU Regulation Number 10 of 2024 to adjust the nomination regulations with democratic principles and applicable laws. Thus, this decision ensures the legality of regional head candidacy and increases the value of democracy in the 2024 simultaneous regional elections in Indonesia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ariawan, I. G. K. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. 1(1), 4.
Basuki, U. (2020). Parpol, Pemilu dan Demokrasi: Dinamika Partai Politik dalam Sistem Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia Perspektif Demokrasi. Kosmik Hukum, 20(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v20i2.8321
Diana, A.L ,Implikasi Pelaksanaan zonasi dalam pemerataan peserta didik baru dan peningkatan kualitas pendidikan,Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam,Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri,2022,hal.15
Fadlillah, I. (2022). Threshold dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam, 2(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.14421/staatsrecht.v2i1.2532
Fikri, S. (2024). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 60 / PUU- XXII / 2024 terhadap Hak Politik dalam Perspektif Teori. ALJ: Amsir Law Journal, 6(105), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v6i1.589
Fitri, N. H., 26 Agustus 2024,Revisi PKPU8/2024 kembalikan maruah dpr atas ruu pilkada, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/revisi-pkpu-8-2024-kembalikan-muruah-dpr-atas-ruu-pilkada-lt66cc221872d15/?page=1,diunduh 30 Desember 2024, 00.22 Wita
Hartono, H. (2024). Urgensi Putusan MK Nomor 60 / PUU-XXII / 2024 Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pilkada Tahun 2024 The Urgency Of Mk Ruling Number 60 / PUU-XXII / 2024 Regarding The Organization Of The 2024 Election. JICN: Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara, September, 374–383.
Hasan, Z., Majidah, S., Yansah, A., & Salsabila, R. F. (2024). Konstitusi Sebagai Dasar Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional JIMA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Keberadaan Konstitusi Sebagai Sumber Hukum dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 2(1), 44–54.
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum,2020,Mataram,Mataram University Press, hal.45
Pawestri, D. P., Cahya, H., Wibowo, N., & Rahman, M. R. (2023). Analisis Dampak Presidential Threshold pada Pemilihan Umum Presiden Republik Indonesia 2024 dari Sudut Pandang Aksiologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 29739–29747. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/11785
Salinan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 60/PUU-XXII/2024
Vitorio Mantalen game changer Pilkada ini pertimbangan MK ubah threshold dan akhiri siasat borong tiket 21 Agustus 2024, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/08/21/05111781/game-changer-pilkada-ini-pertimbangan-mk-ubah-threshold-dan-akhiri-siasat?page=all, diunduh 1 Januari 2025.”